When Pessi­mism Meets Relative Strength

The Tareno Hawk-Eye approach does not rely on forecasts, but rather on confirmed market shifts. Intere­sting oppor­tu­ni­ties can arise, parti­cu­larly in unpopular market segments, when indivi­dual stocks begin to decouple from the weakness of their sector. Airbnb is a prime example of how our quanti­ta­tive invest­ment process identi­fies such signals and imple­ments them in a disci­plined manner.
Signal-AIRBNB-1164x840

Relative Strength as a Key Indicator

Accor­ding to the latest Bank of America Fund Manager Survey, the cyclical consumer sector remains among the least popular market segments. For the Hawk-Eye approach, however, such an environ­ment is not automa­ti­cally negative. What matters is not just how popular or unpopular a sector is, but how indivi­dual stocks react to this environ­ment.

For us, there­fore, extreme senti­ment is not a buy signal. It only becomes intere­sting when a stock shows relative strength despite a weak sector environ­ment and forms a construc­tive price pattern. This is precisely where a key strength of the Hawk-Eye approach lies: It does not look for the supposed bottom, but waits for confirmed changes.

Bild13

Three Signals Supporting the Invest­ment Case for

Three factors recently converged at Airbnb that supported the positive outlook indicated by our models:

Extreme Senti­ment:
The cyclical consumer sector remained signi­fi­cantly unpopular among global fund managers. For Tareno Hawk-Eye, such senti­ment is an important context but not yet a standa­lone entry signal.

Construc­tive price pattern:
While the sector remained under pressure, Airbnb developed incre­a­sing relative strength. The clearly defined price pattern provided our models with the entry signal.

Confir­ma­tion through the market reaction:
The subse­quent quarterly earnings led to a dispro­por­tio­na­tely strong price reaction. Airbnb thus once again clearly distin­gu­ished itself from the cyclical consumer sector and confirmed the previously identi­fied signal.

ABNB_2026-08-10_23-35-58-1164x840

Airbnb Impresses with a +22% Gain in Two Days

Airbnb is a prime example of how the Hawk-Eye approach works in practice. Even before the quarterly earnings were released, our models identi­fied incre­a­sing relative strength. At the same time, the stock developed a positive price pattern despite the weak sector environ­ment.

Follo­wing the release of its quarterly earnings, Airbnb’s stock rose by appro­xi­m­ately +22% within two trading days (as of August 10, 2026). The strong market reaction confirmed the signal we had previously identi­fied. From a funda­mental perspec­tive, the company also impressed with strong growth, a solid balance sheet, and an attrac­tive risk-reward ratio.

Consist­ently capita­li­zing on confirmed market changes

Airbnb thus illustrates a core principle of the Tareno Hawk-Eye approach: It is not the news itself that matters, but the market’s reaction to it. Our invest­ment process does not attempt to predict turning points. It waits for confirmed changes and syste­ma­ti­cally acts on them.

Every day, our quanti­ta­tive models scan several thousand stocks world­wide for precisely these kinds of patterns. The goal is to identify recur­ring market behaviors early on, evaluate them objec­tively, and consist­ently imple­ment them in the portfolio.

Portrait Manuel Schmedler

Would you like to find out more?

Do you have any questions about the Chart of the Month or would you like to find out more about our Hawk-Eye strategy? Our fund manager, Manuel Schmedler, looks forward to hearing from you.

Hawk-Eye certi­fi­cate

Find out more about our Hawk-Eye certi­fi­cate.

Tareno Fund

Discover more funds from Tareno.

Disclaimer

This document has been prepared for marke­ting and infor­ma­tional purposes and does not consti­tute an offer or a solici­ta­tion to subscribe to, buy, or sell shares of this invest­ment fund. It does not consti­tute invest­ment advice. Only the current fund documents (in parti­cular, the prospectus and KID) are exclu­si­vely autho­ri­ta­tive. Past perfor­mance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

Images: Marijke Vosmeer, Luzia Hunziker, Jürg Kaufmann, Istock, Unsplash / Graphics: Tareno AG / Bloom­berg